Contract Source Code:
File 1 of 1 : ARSCB
// File: @openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol
pragma solidity ^0.6.0;
/**
* @dev Wrappers over Solidity's arithmetic operations with added overflow
* checks.
*
* Arithmetic operations in Solidity wrap on overflow. This can easily result
* in bugs, because programmers usually assume that an overflow raises an
* error, which is the standard behavior in high level programming languages.
* `SafeMath` restores this intuition by reverting the transaction when an
* operation overflows.
*
* Using this library instead of the unchecked operations eliminates an entire
* class of bugs, so it's recommended to use it always.
*/
library SafeMath {
/**
* @dev Returns the addition of two unsigned integers, reverting on
* overflow.
*
* Counterpart to Solidity's `+` operator.
*
* Requirements:
* - Addition cannot overflow.
*/
function add(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
uint256 c = a + b;
require(c >= a, "SafeMath: addition overflow");
return c;
}
/**
* @dev Returns the subtraction of two unsigned integers, reverting on
* overflow (when the result is negative).
*
* Counterpart to Solidity's `-` operator.
*
* Requirements:
* - Subtraction cannot overflow.
*/
function sub(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
return sub(a, b, "SafeMath: subtraction overflow");
}
/**
* @dev Returns the subtraction of two unsigned integers, reverting with custom message on
* overflow (when the result is negative).
*
* Counterpart to Solidity's `-` operator.
*
* Requirements:
* - Subtraction cannot overflow.
*/
function sub(uint256 a, uint256 b, string memory errorMessage) internal pure returns (uint256) {
require(b <= a, errorMessage);
uint256 c = a - b;
return c;
}
/**
* @dev Returns the multiplication of two unsigned integers, reverting on
* overflow.
*
* Counterpart to Solidity's `*` operator.
*
* Requirements:
* - Multiplication cannot overflow.
*/
function mul(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
// Gas optimization: this is cheaper than requiring 'a' not being zero, but the
// benefit is lost if 'b' is also tested.
// See: https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/522
if (a == 0) {
return 0;
}
uint256 c = a * b;
require(c / a == b, "SafeMath: multiplication overflow");
return c;
}
/**
* @dev Returns the integer division of two unsigned integers. Reverts on
* division by zero. The result is rounded towards zero.
*
* Counterpart to Solidity's `/` operator. Note: this function uses a
* `revert` opcode (which leaves remaining gas untouched) while Solidity
* uses an invalid opcode to revert (consuming all remaining gas).
*
* Requirements:
* - The divisor cannot be zero.
*/
function div(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
return div(a, b, "SafeMath: division by zero");
}
/**
* @dev Returns the integer division of two unsigned integers. Reverts with custom message on
* division by zero. The result is rounded towards zero.
*
* Counterpart to Solidity's `/` operator. Note: this function uses a
* `revert` opcode (which leaves remaining gas untouched) while Solidity
* uses an invalid opcode to revert (consuming all remaining gas).
*
* Requirements:
* - The divisor cannot be zero.
*/
function div(uint256 a, uint256 b, string memory errorMessage) internal pure returns (uint256) {
// Solidity only automatically asserts when dividing by 0
require(b > 0, errorMessage);
uint256 c = a / b;
// assert(a == b * c + a % b); // There is no case in which this doesn't hold
return c;
}
/**
* @dev Returns the remainder of dividing two unsigned integers. (unsigned integer modulo),
* Reverts when dividing by zero.
*
* Counterpart to Solidity's `%` operator. This function uses a `revert`
* opcode (which leaves remaining gas untouched) while Solidity uses an
* invalid opcode to revert (consuming all remaining gas).
*
* Requirements:
* - The divisor cannot be zero.
*/
function mod(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
return mod(a, b, "SafeMath: modulo by zero");
}
/**
* @dev Returns the remainder of dividing two unsigned integers. (unsigned integer modulo),
* Reverts with custom message when dividing by zero.
*
* Counterpart to Solidity's `%` operator. This function uses a `revert`
* opcode (which leaves remaining gas untouched) while Solidity uses an
* invalid opcode to revert (consuming all remaining gas).
*
* Requirements:
* - The divisor cannot be zero.
*/
function mod(uint256 a, uint256 b, string memory errorMessage) internal pure returns (uint256) {
require(b != 0, errorMessage);
return a % b;
}
}
// File: @openzeppelin/contracts/cryptography/ECDSA.sol
pragma solidity ^0.6.0;
/**
* @dev Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) operations.
*
* These functions can be used to verify that a message was signed by the holder
* of the private keys of a given address.
*/
library ECDSA {
/**
* @dev Returns the address that signed a hashed message (`hash`) with
* `signature`. This address can then be used for verification purposes.
*
* The `ecrecover` EVM opcode allows for malleable (non-unique) signatures:
* this function rejects them by requiring the `s` value to be in the lower
* half order, and the `v` value to be either 27 or 28.
*
* IMPORTANT: `hash` _must_ be the result of a hash operation for the
* verification to be secure: it is possible to craft signatures that
* recover to arbitrary addresses for non-hashed data. A safe way to ensure
* this is by receiving a hash of the original message (which may otherwise
* be too long), and then calling {toEthSignedMessageHash} on it.
*/
function recover(bytes32 hash, bytes memory signature) internal pure returns (address) {
// Check the signature length
if (signature.length != 65) {
revert("ECDSA: invalid signature length");
}
// Divide the signature in r, s and v variables
bytes32 r;
bytes32 s;
uint8 v;
// ecrecover takes the signature parameters, and the only way to get them
// currently is to use assembly.
// solhint-disable-next-line no-inline-assembly
assembly {
r := mload(add(signature, 0x20))
s := mload(add(signature, 0x40))
v := byte(0, mload(add(signature, 0x60)))
}
// EIP-2 still allows signature malleability for ecrecover(). Remove this possibility and make the signature
// unique. Appendix F in the Ethereum Yellow paper (https://ethereum.github.io/yellowpaper/paper.pdf), defines
// the valid range for s in (281): 0 < s < secp256k1n ÷ 2 + 1, and for v in (282): v ∈ {27, 28}. Most
// signatures from current libraries generate a unique signature with an s-value in the lower half order.
//
// If your library generates malleable signatures, such as s-values in the upper range, calculate a new s-value
// with 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364141 - s1 and flip v from 27 to 28 or
// vice versa. If your library also generates signatures with 0/1 for v instead 27/28, add 27 to v to accept
// these malleable signatures as well.
if (uint256(s) > 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF5D576E7357A4501DDFE92F46681B20A0) {
revert("ECDSA: invalid signature 's' value");
}
if (v != 27 && v != 28) {
revert("ECDSA: invalid signature 'v' value");
}
// If the signature is valid (and not malleable), return the signer address
address signer = ecrecover(hash, v, r, s);
require(signer != address(0), "ECDSA: invalid signature");
return signer;
}
/**
* @dev Returns an Ethereum Signed Message, created from a `hash`. This
* replicates the behavior of the
* https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/JSON-RPC#eth_sign[`eth_sign`]
* JSON-RPC method.
*
* See {recover}.
*/
function toEthSignedMessageHash(bytes32 hash) internal pure returns (bytes32) {
// 32 is the length in bytes of hash,
// enforced by the type signature above
return keccak256(abi.encodePacked("\x19Ethereum Signed Message:\n32", hash));
}
}
// File: @openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol
pragma solidity ^0.6.2;
/**
* @dev Collection of functions related to the address type
*/
library Address {
/**
* @dev Returns true if `account` is a contract.
*
* [IMPORTANT]
* ====
* It is unsafe to assume that an address for which this function returns
* false is an externally-owned account (EOA) and not a contract.
*
* Among others, `isContract` will return false for the following
* types of addresses:
*
* - an externally-owned account
* - a contract in construction
* - an address where a contract will be created
* - an address where a contract lived, but was destroyed
* ====
*/
function isContract(address account) internal view returns (bool) {
// According to EIP-1052, 0x0 is the value returned for not-yet created accounts
// and 0xc5d2460186f7233c927e7db2dcc703c0e500b653ca82273b7bfad8045d85a470 is returned
// for accounts without code, i.e. `keccak256('')`
bytes32 codehash;
bytes32 accountHash = 0xc5d2460186f7233c927e7db2dcc703c0e500b653ca82273b7bfad8045d85a470;
// solhint-disable-next-line no-inline-assembly
assembly { codehash := extcodehash(account) }
return (codehash != accountHash && codehash != 0x0);
}
/**
* @dev Replacement for Solidity's `transfer`: sends `amount` wei to
* `recipient`, forwarding all available gas and reverting on errors.
*
* https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1884[EIP1884] increases the gas cost
* of certain opcodes, possibly making contracts go over the 2300 gas limit
* imposed by `transfer`, making them unable to receive funds via
* `transfer`. {sendValue} removes this limitation.
*
* https://diligence.consensys.net/posts/2019/09/stop-using-soliditys-transfer-now/[Learn more].
*
* IMPORTANT: because control is transferred to `recipient`, care must be
* taken to not create reentrancy vulnerabilities. Consider using
* {ReentrancyGuard} or the
* https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/v0.5.11/security-considerations.html#use-the-checks-effects-interactions-pattern[checks-effects-interactions pattern].
*/
function sendValue(address payable recipient, uint256 amount) internal {
require(address(this).balance >= amount, "Address: insufficient balance");
// solhint-disable-next-line avoid-low-level-calls, avoid-call-value
(bool success, ) = recipient.call{ value: amount }("");
require(success, "Address: unable to send value, recipient may have reverted");
}
}
// File: @openzeppelin/contracts/GSN/Context.sol
pragma solidity ^0.6.0;
/*
* @dev Provides information about the current execution context, including the
* sender of the transaction and its data. While these are generally available
* via msg.sender and msg.data, they should not be accessed in such a direct
* manner, since when dealing with GSN meta-transactions the account sending and
* paying for execution may not be the actual sender (as far as an application
* is concerned).
*
* This contract is only required for intermediate, library-like contracts.
*/
contract Context {
// Empty internal constructor, to prevent people from mistakenly deploying
// an instance of this contract, which should be used via inheritance.
constructor () internal { }
function _msgSender() internal view virtual returns (address payable) {
return msg.sender;
}
function _msgData() internal view virtual returns (bytes memory) {
this; // silence state mutability warning without generating bytecode - see https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/2691
return msg.data;
}
}
// File: @openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol
pragma solidity ^0.6.0;
/**
* @dev Interface of the ERC20 standard as defined in the EIP.
*/
interface IERC20 {
/**
* @dev Returns the amount of tokens in existence.
*/
function totalSupply() external view returns (uint256);
/**
* @dev Returns the amount of tokens owned by `account`.
*/
function balanceOf(address account) external view returns (uint256);
/**
* @dev Moves `amount` tokens from the caller's account to `recipient`.
*
* Returns a boolean value indicating whether the operation succeeded.
*
* Emits a {Transfer} event.
*/
function transfer(address recipient, uint256 amount) external returns (bool);
/**
* @dev Returns the remaining number of tokens that `spender` will be
* allowed to spend on behalf of `owner` through {transferFrom}. This is
* zero by default.
*
* This value changes when {approve} or {transferFrom} are called.
*/
function allowance(address owner, address spender) external view returns (uint256);
/**
* @dev Sets `amount` as the allowance of `spender` over the caller's tokens.
*
* Returns a boolean value indicating whether the operation succeeded.
*
* IMPORTANT: Beware that changing an allowance with this method brings the risk
* that someone may use both the old and the new allowance by unfortunate
* transaction ordering. One possible solution to mitigate this race
* condition is to first reduce the spender's allowance to 0 and set the
* desired value afterwards:
* https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/20#issuecomment-263524729
*
* Emits an {Approval} event.
*/
function approve(address spender, uint256 amount) external returns (bool);
/**
* @dev Moves `amount` tokens from `sender` to `recipient` using the
* allowance mechanism. `amount` is then deducted from the caller's
* allowance.
*
* Returns a boolean value indicating whether the operation succeeded.
*
* Emits a {Transfer} event.
*/
function transferFrom(address sender, address recipient, uint256 amount) external returns (bool);
/**
* @dev Emitted when `value` tokens are moved from one account (`from`) to
* another (`to`).
*
* Note that `value` may be zero.
*/
event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value);
/**
* @dev Emitted when the allowance of a `spender` for an `owner` is set by
* a call to {approve}. `value` is the new allowance.
*/
event Approval(address indexed owner, address indexed spender, uint256 value);
}
// File: @openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol
pragma solidity ^0.6.0;
/**
* @dev Implementation of the {IERC20} interface.
*
* This implementation is agnostic to the way tokens are created. This means
* that a supply mechanism has to be added in a derived contract using {_mint}.
* For a generic mechanism see {ERC20MinterPauser}.
*
* TIP: For a detailed writeup see our guide
* https://forum.zeppelin.solutions/t/how-to-implement-erc20-supply-mechanisms/226[How
* to implement supply mechanisms].
*
* We have followed general OpenZeppelin guidelines: functions revert instead
* of returning `false` on failure. This behavior is nonetheless conventional
* and does not conflict with the expectations of ERC20 applications.
*
* Additionally, an {Approval} event is emitted on calls to {transferFrom}.
* This allows applications to reconstruct the allowance for all accounts just
* by listening to said events. Other implementations of the EIP may not emit
* these events, as it isn't required by the specification.
*
* Finally, the non-standard {decreaseAllowance} and {increaseAllowance}
* functions have been added to mitigate the well-known issues around setting
* allowances. See {IERC20-approve}.
*/
contract ERC20 is Context, IERC20 {
using SafeMath for uint256;
using Address for address;
mapping (address => uint256) private _balances;
mapping (address => mapping (address => uint256)) private _allowances;
uint256 private _totalSupply;
string private _name;
string private _symbol;
uint8 private _decimals;
/**
* @dev Sets the values for {name} and {symbol}, initializes {decimals} with
* a default value of 18.
*
* To select a different value for {decimals}, use {_setupDecimals}.
*
* All three of these values are immutable: they can only be set once during
* construction.
*/
constructor (string memory name, string memory symbol) public {
_name = name;
_symbol = symbol;
_decimals = 18;
}
/**
* @dev Returns the name of the token.
*/
function name() public view returns (string memory) {
return _name;
}
/**
* @dev Returns the symbol of the token, usually a shorter version of the
* name.
*/
function symbol() public view returns (string memory) {
return _symbol;
}
/**
* @dev Returns the number of decimals used to get its user representation.
* For example, if `decimals` equals `2`, a balance of `505` tokens should
* be displayed to a user as `5,05` (`505 / 10 ** 2`).
*
* Tokens usually opt for a value of 18, imitating the relationship between
* Ether and Wei. This is the value {ERC20} uses, unless {_setupDecimals} is
* called.
*
* NOTE: This information is only used for _display_ purposes: it in
* no way affects any of the arithmetic of the contract, including
* {IERC20-balanceOf} and {IERC20-transfer}.
*/
function decimals() public view returns (uint8) {
return _decimals;
}
/**
* @dev See {IERC20-totalSupply}.
*/
function totalSupply() public view override returns (uint256) {
return _totalSupply;
}
/**
* @dev See {IERC20-balanceOf}.
*/
function balanceOf(address account) public view override returns (uint256) {
return _balances[account];
}
/**
* @dev See {IERC20-transfer}.
*
* Requirements:
*
* - `recipient` cannot be the zero address.
* - the caller must have a balance of at least `amount`.
*/
function transfer(address recipient, uint256 amount) public virtual override returns (bool) {
_transfer(_msgSender(), recipient, amount);
return true;
}
/**
* @dev See {IERC20-allowance}.
*/
function allowance(address owner, address spender) public view virtual override returns (uint256) {
return _allowances[owner][spender];
}
/**
* @dev See {IERC20-approve}.
*
* Requirements:
*
* - `spender` cannot be the zero address.
*/
function approve(address spender, uint256 amount) public virtual override returns (bool) {
_approve(_msgSender(), spender, amount);
return true;
}
/**
* @dev See {IERC20-transferFrom}.
*
* Emits an {Approval} event indicating the updated allowance. This is not
* required by the EIP. See the note at the beginning of {ERC20};
*
* Requirements:
* - `sender` and `recipient` cannot be the zero address.
* - `sender` must have a balance of at least `amount`.
* - the caller must have allowance for ``sender``'s tokens of at least
* `amount`.
*/
function transferFrom(address sender, address recipient, uint256 amount) public virtual override returns (bool) {
_transfer(sender, recipient, amount);
_approve(sender, _msgSender(), _allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount, "ERC20: transfer amount exceeds allowance"));
return true;
}
/**
* @dev Atomically increases the allowance granted to `spender` by the caller.
*
* This is an alternative to {approve} that can be used as a mitigation for
* problems described in {IERC20-approve}.
*
* Emits an {Approval} event indicating the updated allowance.
*
* Requirements:
*
* - `spender` cannot be the zero address.
*/
function increaseAllowance(address spender, uint256 addedValue) public virtual returns (bool) {
_approve(_msgSender(), spender, _allowances[_msgSender()][spender].add(addedValue));
return true;
}
/**
* @dev Atomically decreases the allowance granted to `spender` by the caller.
*
* This is an alternative to {approve} that can be used as a mitigation for
* problems described in {IERC20-approve}.
*
* Emits an {Approval} event indicating the updated allowance.
*
* Requirements:
*
* - `spender` cannot be the zero address.
* - `spender` must have allowance for the caller of at least
* `subtractedValue`.
*/
function decreaseAllowance(address spender, uint256 subtractedValue) public virtual returns (bool) {
_approve(_msgSender(), spender, _allowances[_msgSender()][spender].sub(subtractedValue, "ERC20: decreased allowance below zero"));
return true;
}
/**
* @dev Moves tokens `amount` from `sender` to `recipient`.
*
* This is internal function is equivalent to {transfer}, and can be used to
* e.g. implement automatic token fees, slashing mechanisms, etc.
*
* Emits a {Transfer} event.
*
* Requirements:
*
* - `sender` cannot be the zero address.
* - `recipient` cannot be the zero address.
* - `sender` must have a balance of at least `amount`.
*/
function _transfer(address sender, address recipient, uint256 amount) internal virtual {
require(sender != address(0), "ERC20: transfer from the zero address");
require(recipient != address(0), "ERC20: transfer to the zero address");
_beforeTokenTransfer(sender, recipient, amount);
_balances[sender] = _balances[sender].sub(amount, "ERC20: transfer amount exceeds balance");
_balances[recipient] = _balances[recipient].add(amount);
emit Transfer(sender, recipient, amount);
}
/** @dev Creates `amount` tokens and assigns them to `account`, increasing
* the total supply.
*
* Emits a {Transfer} event with `from` set to the zero address.
*
* Requirements
*
* - `to` cannot be the zero address.
*/
function _mint(address account, uint256 amount) internal virtual {
require(account != address(0), "ERC20: mint to the zero address");
_beforeTokenTransfer(address(0), account, amount);
_totalSupply = _totalSupply.add(amount);
_balances[account] = _balances[account].add(amount);
emit Transfer(address(0), account, amount);
}
/**
* @dev Destroys `amount` tokens from `account`, reducing the
* total supply.
*
* Emits a {Transfer} event with `to` set to the zero address.
*
* Requirements
*
* - `account` cannot be the zero address.
* - `account` must have at least `amount` tokens.
*/
function _burn(address account, uint256 amount) internal virtual {
require(account != address(0), "ERC20: burn from the zero address");
_beforeTokenTransfer(account, address(0), amount);
_balances[account] = _balances[account].sub(amount, "ERC20: burn amount exceeds balance");
_totalSupply = _totalSupply.sub(amount);
emit Transfer(account, address(0), amount);
}
/**
* @dev Sets `amount` as the allowance of `spender` over the `owner`s tokens.
*
* This is internal function is equivalent to `approve`, and can be used to
* e.g. set automatic allowances for certain subsystems, etc.
*
* Emits an {Approval} event.
*
* Requirements:
*
* - `owner` cannot be the zero address.
* - `spender` cannot be the zero address.
*/
function _approve(address owner, address spender, uint256 amount) internal virtual {
require(owner != address(0), "ERC20: approve from the zero address");
require(spender != address(0), "ERC20: approve to the zero address");
_allowances[owner][spender] = amount;
emit Approval(owner, spender, amount);
}
/**
* @dev Sets {decimals} to a value other than the default one of 18.
*
* WARNING: This function should only be called from the constructor. Most
* applications that interact with token contracts will not expect
* {decimals} to ever change, and may work incorrectly if it does.
*/
function _setupDecimals(uint8 decimals_) internal {
_decimals = decimals_;
}
/**
* @dev Hook that is called before any transfer of tokens. This includes
* minting and burning.
*
* Calling conditions:
*
* - when `from` and `to` are both non-zero, `amount` of ``from``'s tokens
* will be to transferred to `to`.
* - when `from` is zero, `amount` tokens will be minted for `to`.
* - when `to` is zero, `amount` of ``from``'s tokens will be burned.
* - `from` and `to` are never both zero.
*
* To learn more about hooks, head to xref:ROOT:extending-contracts.adoc#using-hooks[Using Hooks].
*/
function _beforeTokenTransfer(address from, address to, uint256 amount) internal virtual { }
}
// File: contracts/ERC865Plus677ish.sol
pragma solidity >=0.6.0 <0.7.0;
/**
* @title ERC677 transferAndCall token interface
* @dev See https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/677 for specification and
* discussion.
*
* We deviate from the specification and we don't define a tokenfallback. That means
* tranferAndCall can specify the function to call (bytes4(sha3("setN(uint256)")))
* and its arguments, and the respective function is called.
*
* If an invalid function is called, its default function (if implemented) is called.
*
* We also deviate from ERC865 and added a pre signed transaction for transferAndCall.
*/
/*
Notes on signature malleability: Ethereum took the same
precaution as in bitcoin was used to prevent that:
https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/master/vendor/github.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcec/signature.go#L48
https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/master/crypto/signature_test.go
https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-155.md
https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2.md
However, ecrecover still allows ambigous signatures. Thus, recover that wraps ecrecover checks for ambigous
signatures and only allows unique signatures.
*/
abstract contract ERC865Plus677ish {
event TransferAndCall(address indexed _from, address indexed _to, uint256 _value, bytes4 _methodName, bytes _args);
function transferAndCall(address _to, uint256 _value, bytes4 _methodName, bytes memory _args) public virtual returns (bool);
event TransferPreSigned(address indexed _from, address indexed _to, address indexed _delegate,
uint256 _amount, uint256 _fee);
event TransferAndCallPreSigned(address indexed _from, address indexed _to, address indexed _delegate,
uint256 _amount, uint256 _fee, bytes4 _methodName, bytes _args);
function transferPreSigned(bytes memory _signature, address _from, address _to, uint256 _value,
uint256 _fee, uint256 _nonce) public virtual returns (bool);
function transferAndCallPreSigned(bytes memory _signature, address _from, address _to, uint256 _value,
uint256 _fee, uint256 _nonce, bytes4 _methodName, bytes memory _args) public virtual returns (bool);
}
// File: contracts/BaseToken.sol
pragma solidity >=0.6.0 <0.7.0;
abstract contract Basetoken is ERC20, ERC865Plus677ish {
using SafeMath for uint256;
using ECDSA for bytes32;
using Address for address;
/**
* Events
*/
event MyLog( address indexed _from, uint256 _value);
// ownership
address public owner;
uint8 private _decimals;
// nonces of transfers performed
mapping(bytes => bool) signatures;
constructor(string memory name, string memory symbol ) ERC20(name, symbol) public {
owner = msg.sender;
}
//**************** OVERRIDE ERC20 *******************************************************************************************
/**
* @dev Allows the current owner to transfer the ownership.
* @param _newOwner The address to transfer ownership to.
*/
function transferOwnership(address _newOwner) public onlyOwner {
require(owner == msg.sender,'Only owner can transfer the ownership');
owner = _newOwner;
}
/**
* Minting functionality to multiples recipients
*/
function mint(address[] memory _recipients, uint256[] memory _amounts) public onlyOwner {
require(owner == msg.sender,'Only owner can add new tokens');
require(_recipients.length == _amounts.length,'Invalid size of recipients|amount');
require(_recipients.length <= 10,'Only allow mint 10 recipients');
for (uint8 i = 0; i < _recipients.length; i++) {
address recipient = _recipients[i];
uint256 amount = _amounts[i];
_mint(recipient, amount);
}
}
function doTransfer(address _from, address _to, uint256 _value, uint256 _fee, address _feeAddress) internal {
emit MyLog(_from, _value);
require(_to != address(0),'Invalid recipient address');
uint256 total = _value.add(_fee);
require(total <= balanceOf(_from),'Insufficient funds');
emit MyLog(_from, _value);
myTransferFrom(_from,_to,_value);
//Agregar el fee a la address fee
if(_fee > 0 && _feeAddress != address(0)) {
myTransferFrom(_from,_feeAddress,_fee);
}
}
/**
* @dev See {IERC20-transferFrom}.
*
* Emits an {Approval} event indicating the updated allowance. This is not
* required by the EIP. See the note at the beginning of {ERC20};
*
* Requirements:
* - `sender` and `recipient` cannot be the zero address.
* - `sender` must have a balance of at least `amount`.
* - the caller must have allowance for ``sender``'s tokens of at least
* `amount`.
*/
function myTransferFrom(address from, address to, uint256 amount) public onlyOwner returns (bool) {
_transfer(from, to, amount);
//Check if allow use amount to spent
uint256 allowed= allowance(msg.sender, from);
uint256 diff=allowed.sub(amount);
_approve(from, msg.sender, diff);
return true;
}
//**************** END OVERRIDE ERC20 *******************************************************************************************
//**************** FROM ERC865 *******************************************************************************************
function transferAndCall(address _to, uint256 _value, bytes4 _methodName, bytes memory _args) public override returns (bool) {
require(transferFromSender(_to, _value),'Invalid transfer from sender');
emit TransferAndCall(msg.sender, _to, _value, _methodName, _args);
// call receiver
require(Address.isContract(_to),'Address is not contract');
(bool success, ) = _to.call(abi.encodePacked(abi.encodeWithSelector(_methodName, msg.sender, _value), _args));
require(success, 'Transfer unsuccesfully');
return success;
}
//ERC 865 + delegate transfer and call
function transferPreSigned(bytes memory _signature, address _from, address _to, uint256 _value, uint256 _fee, uint256 _nonce) public override returns (bool) {
require(!signatures[_signature],'Signature already used');
bytes32 hashedTx = transferPreSignedHashing(address(this), _to, _value, _fee, _nonce);
address from = ECDSA.recover(hashedTx, _signature);
//if hashedTx does not fit to _signature Utils.recover resp. Solidity's ecrecover returns another (random) address,
//if this returned address does have enough tokens, they would be transferred, therefor we check if the retrieved
//signature is equal the specified one
require(from == _from,'Invalid sender1');
require(from != address(0),'Invalid sender address');
doTransfer(from, _to, _value, _fee, msg.sender);
signatures[_signature] = true;
emit TransferPreSigned(from, _to, msg.sender, _value, _fee);
return true;
}
function transferAndCallPreSigned(bytes memory _signature, address _from, address _to, uint256 _value, uint256 _fee, uint256 _nonce,
bytes4 _methodName, bytes memory _args) public override returns (bool) {
require(!signatures[_signature],'Signature already used');
bytes32 hashedTx = transferAndCallPreSignedHashing(address(this), _to, _value, _fee, _nonce, _methodName, _args);
address from = ECDSA.recover(hashedTx, _signature);
/**
*if hashedTx does not fit to _signature Utils.recover resp. Solidity's ecrecover returns another (random) address,
*if this returned address does have enough tokens, they would be transferred, therefor we check if the retrieved
*signature is equal the specified one
**/
require(from == _from,'Invalid sender');
require(from != address(0),'Invalid sender address');
doTransfer(from, _to, _value, _fee, msg.sender);
signatures[_signature] = true;
emit TransferAndCallPreSigned(from, _to, msg.sender, _value, _fee, _methodName, _args);
// call receiver
require(Address.isContract(_to),'Address is not contract');
//call on behalf of from and not msg.sender
(bool success, ) = _to.call(abi.encodePacked(abi.encodeWithSelector(_methodName, from, _value), _args));
require(success);
return success;
}
//**************** END FROM ERC865 *******************************************************************************************
//*****************************UTILS FUNCTIONS****************************************************************
/**
* From: https://github.com/PROPSProject/props-token-distribution/blob/master/contracts/token/ERC865Token.sol
* adapted to: https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/v0.5.3/050-breaking-changes.html?highlight=abi%20encode
* @notice Hash (keccak256) of the payload used by transferPreSigned
* @param _token address The address of the token.
* @param _to address The address which you want to transfer to.
* @param _value uint256 The amount of tokens to be transferred.
* @param _fee uint256 The amount of tokens paid to msg.sender, by the owner.
*/
function transferAndCallPreSignedHashing(address _token, address _to, uint256 _value, uint256 _fee, uint256 _nonce,
bytes4 _methodName, bytes memory _args) internal pure returns (bytes32) {
/* "38980f82": transferAndCallPreSignedHashing(address,address,uint256,uint256,uint256,bytes4,bytes) */
return keccak256(abi.encode(bytes4(0x38980f82), _token, _to, _value, _fee, _nonce, _methodName, _args));
}
function transferPreSignedHashing(address _token, address _to, uint256 _value, uint256 _fee, uint256 _nonce)
internal pure returns (bytes32) {
/* "15420b71": transferPreSignedHashing(address,address,uint256,uint256,uint256) */
return keccak256(abi.encode(bytes4(0x15420b71), _token, _to, _value, _fee, _nonce));
}
function transferFromSender(address _to, uint256 _value) private returns (bool) {
doTransfer(msg.sender, _to, _value, 0, address(0));
return true;
}
modifier onlyOwner() {
require(msg.sender == owner, "Access denied");
_;
}
//*****************************END UTILS FUNCTIONS**********************************************************
}
// File: contracts/ARSCB.sol
pragma solidity >=0.6.0 <0.7.0;
contract ARSCB is Basetoken{
constructor() Basetoken("Pesos Argentinos", "ARSCB") public{
}
}